← Back to interactive report demo
FG Styles Co. — Q1 2025 Freight Dashboard
1 Jan – 31 Mar 2025
Delivered May 2025
Carrier Period
Total Freight Spend
$25,350
Q1 2025 · all carriers
▲ 6.2% vs Q4 2024
Consignments
1,260
$420/mo average
▲ 4.1% vs Q4 2024
Avg Cost / Consignment
$20.12
AU benchmark: $16.40 (460k+ orders)
+$3.72 above benchmark
Identified Savings
$16,680
Annualised · 4 actions
Achievable < 60 days
Monthly Spend Trend
Spend by Carrier
Carrier Summary
Carrier Consignments Share Total Spend Avg / Con. vs Benchmark Vol. Rate
AusPost 76060.3%$16,215$21.34 +$4.94 72%
Couriers Please 42033.3%$7,537$17.94 +$1.54 58%
Aramex 806.3%$1,598$19.98 +$3.58 80%
All carriers 1,260100%$25,350$20.12 +$3.72 71%
👤  Mitch's Take

The volumetric billing rate is the standout finding. 71% of consignments billed on volumetric weight against a 48% AU benchmark is one of the higher gaps I've seen. This almost always traces back to packaging that hasn't been reviewed since launch. Standardising to 2-3 box sizes mapped to your actual product weights typically closes most of this within a month and it makes every other cost metric look better in the process.

AusPost is carrying too much at too high a price. At 60% of volume and $21.34/consignment, it's covering routes where CP or Aramex would cost $3-5 less per parcel. The routing rules adjustment is low-effort and I'd action that before any carrier negotiation conversation.

The Uber Direct opportunity is worth a proper look. 34% of orders landing within 15km of the Alexandria warehouse is a density you can monetise. At $6.50-9.00/consignment versus $18-22 AusPost metro, a 4-week pilot is low-risk and the savings are real if customer acceptance holds.

— Mitch · FreightGauge
AusPost
760 cons
$16,215
$21.34 avg · 72% vol. billed
22% above CP for same zones
Couriers Please
420 cons
$7,537
$17.94 avg · 58% vol. billed
Best avg rate of active carriers
Aramex
80 cons
$1,598
$19.98 avg · 80% vol. billed
Highest vol. rate of 3 carriers
Avg Cost per Consignment — Carrier Comparison
Consignment Volume by Carrier
Spend Composition by Charge Type
Carrier Alternatives Assessed
Evaluate
Uber Direct — 34% of orders within 15km of Alexandria warehouse. Est. $6.50–$9.00 per con vs $18–22 AusPost metro. $2,800/yr saving.
Evaluate
StarTrack — For orders $180+, premium tracking reduces returns freight and CS contacts. ~120 orders/quarter in this band.
Not Recommended
TNT / FedEx Express — Strong express network but rates of $25–40+ per parcel are not competitive for sub-2kg apparel without a negotiated rate card. Revisit at 2,000+ cons/month.
Freight Spend by State
Consignment Volume by State
Delivery Zone Breakdown
Top 10 Postcodes by Freight Spend
PostcodeSuburbStateCons.SpendAvg
Overall Vol. Rate
71%
895 of 1,260 cons billed on volumetric weight
AU benchmark: 48% (460k+ orders)
Vol. vs Benchmark Gap
+23 pts
Above AU benchmark for this weight profile
Gap review included in report
Avg Vol. Weight
1.42 kg
Avg actual weight: 0.74 kg
1.9x actual weight
Anomalies Flagged
38
Recoverable: $340–$480
Raise dispute with carriers
Weight Band Distribution
Vol. Billing Rate by Carrier vs Benchmark
Anomaly Breakdown
4
Duplicate billing events
22
Weight class mismatches
12
Incorrect surcharges
$410
Est. recoverable (mid)
Note: Shipping margin analysis requires your orders export (revenue per order). The figures below are modelled from the supplied carrier invoice data — confirm against your actual revenue for precise margin rates.
Free Shipping Rate
58%
731 of 1,260 orders at $75 threshold
Threshold too low for your AOV
Avg Order Value
$94
Current threshold: $75
Gap of only $19 to threshold
Freight Subsidised / Qtr
$8,220
32% of total freight spend
Cost absorbed on free orders
Saving at $95 Threshold
$8,400
Annualised · low conversion impact
Highest-impact single action
Free vs Paid Shipping by Order Value Band
Free Shipping Threshold Modeller
Free shipping threshold $75
Drag to model different threshold values
58%
Orders qualify
$8,220
Freight subsidised / qtr
$0
Quarterly saving vs current
Freight Margin — Charged to Customer vs Cost
AU carrier benchmarks: Performance figures sourced from Shippit platform data (AU domestic, 12-month rolling window, 327,000+ consignments). In a live engagement, these reflect your specific shipments rather than the network average.
AusPost
DIFOT (on time) 93%
First attempt delivery 99%
CIFOT (pickup on time) 97%
Avg transit (bus. days) 1.9
Tier 1 benchmark: 95%+ DIFOT · CIFOT 93% marginally below Tier 1
Couriers Please
DIFOT (on time) 92%
First attempt delivery 97%
CIFOT (pickup on time) 87% ⚠
Avg transit (bus. days) 1.5
CIFOT 87% below 90% flag threshold — recommend pickup schedule review with CP account manager
Aramex
DIFOT (on time) 91%
First attempt delivery 96%
CIFOT (pickup on time) 94%
Avg transit (bus. days) 2.2
Tier 1 benchmark: 95%+ DIFOT · DIFOT and CIFOT both below Tier 1
DIFOT by Carrier — On-Time Delivery Rate
First Attempt Delivery Rate by Carrier
CIFOT — Pickup On-Time Rate by Carrier
Key Findings
CP flag
CP and Aramex DIFOT (92% and 91%) are both below the 95% Tier 1 benchmark. With 33% of volume on CP, closing the gap to 95% would recover an estimated 130 consignments/quarter from late delivery.
CP pickup
CP pickup on-time (CIFOT) of 87% is below the 90% flag threshold. Late pickups cascade into late deliveries. Review manifest cutoff time with CP account manager.
AusPost
AusPost leading at 97% DIFOT and 99% first-attempt rate. Cost premium vs CP and Aramex is partially offset by lower redelivery costs and fewer customer service contacts.
Metric definitions: DIFOT = Delivered In Full On Time. CIFOT = Collected In Full On Time (pickup SLA). First attempt = no redelivery required. Source: PRODUCT_PRD.CORTEX.CORTEX_ORDERS (AU domestic, 12-month rolling window).